ArticleBMJ public health2025
Nationwide trends of online consultations in China: a 10-year sequential cross-sectional study of 65 305 clinicians.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Prescriptions and Pharmacy Services in Internet-Based Psychiatric Hospital During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The pandemic of COVID-19 accelerated the implementation of telemedicine and promoted the use of online consultations. This study aims to investigate the nationwide trends of online consultations over 10 years in China. Methods: This is a sequential cross-sectional study to evaluate the usage of online consultations among clinicians from different specialities between 2014 and 2023. Stratified random sampling was applied to invite participants according to the geographical distribution of registered clinicians. The basic demographic information on gender, age, career levels, the specialities of practice, hospital levels across the region and city, and time spent on work-related online activities was collected. The average time spent on online consultations per week was the main outcome. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to compare the profile differences of using mobile health applications. Results: A total of 65 305 clinicians from 39 clinical specialities in 31 provinces of China were interviewed anonymously through online surveys. On average, clinicians spent 36·5 hours per week on online activities in 2023 which increased from 20·7 hours per week in 2014. Time spent on online consultations has increased over the past 10 years from 1·1 to 2·9 hours with an average annual growth rate of 26%. Primary care and paediatric clinicians were the top-ranked in 2023. A general trend of increased time spent on online consultations can be observed with a particular spike during COVID-19. Mobile health has become popular for online consultations on portable devices. WeChat is the most common platform used (81·5%). In the multivariable analysis, clinicians with younger ages, senior career levels or from the department of surgery were more likely to use traditional websites for online consultation, but the interaction effect was observed between age and career levels. Conclusions: Online consultations have become popular across different clinical disciplines in China over the past 10 years. There is a good acceptance of using mobile health for online consultations, and it may further enhance the accessibility of healthcare services, especially for patients who live in rural areas. Corresponding guidelines should be established to regulate the quality of online consultations for the future development of virtual healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.