Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697390›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Glaucoma Severity and Progression Using Imo/TEMPO Screening Program.

Kei Sano, Euido Nishijima, Shunsuke Sumi, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Yuka Igari, Aiko Iwase, Tadashi Nakano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kei SanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Euido NishijimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke SumiInstitute for Quantitative Biosciences (IQB), University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiko NoroDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shumpei OgawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuka IgariDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Aiko IwaseTajimi Iwase Eye Clinic, Tajimi, Japan.
Tadashi NakanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop DeepISP, a deep learning model that predicts the comprehensive visual field (VF) information of the Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) based on rapid screening perimetry (Imo/TEMPO screening program [ISP]). Design: A retrospective, cross-sectional, and longitudinal cohort database study. Participants: One hundred eighty-seven actual ISPs from 112 patients who underwent both ISP and HFA 24-2 on the same day at the Jikei University School of Medicine Affiliated Hospital and 3470 synthesized ISPs from 883 patients who underwent VF measurements using HFA 24-2 and HFA 10-2 at 4 hospitals affiliated with Jikei University School of Medicine. Methods: We developed 2 variants of multitask neural networks designed to predict both current VF parameters and VF progression parameters. We also evaluated the efficacy of data augmentation to synthesize ISP tests created by combining 20 points from HFA 24-2 and 8 points from HFA 10-2, with thresholding applied to these 28 points. Main Outcome Measures: Mean absolute error for mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI). Mean F1 score for total deviation (TD) and pattern deviation (PD) probability plot classification. Area under the curve (AUC) for MD progression (MD slope <-1.0 decibel/year) and VFI progression (VFI slope <-1.8%/year). Results: DeepISP could predict current VF status. Mean absolute errors for predicting MD, PSD, and VFI were 1.869 ± 0.114, 1.918 ± 0.082, and 5.146 ± 0.487, respectively. The mean F1 scores for pointwise classification of TD and PD probability plots were 0.761 ± 0.002 and 0.775 ± 0.002, respectively. The AUC for classifying glaucoma hemifield test was 0.920 ± 0.008. DeepISP was also capable of predicting VF progression, with AUCs of 0.828 ± 0.060 and 0.832 ± 0.062 for predicting MD and VFI progression, respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrated ISP's versatility and capability in predicting comprehensive VF information, including current severity and progression risk. Our DeepISP serves as an efficient tool for screening and prioritizing patients with glaucoma for clinical intervention using only a single rapid ISP test. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Deep learningGlaucomaPerimetryScreeningVisual field

Identifiers

PMID40697390
PMCPMC12281144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.