ArticleOphthalmology science
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Glaucoma Severity and Progression Using Imo/TEMPO Screening Program.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accurate Prediction of Humphrey 10-2 Visual Fields in Glaucoma from a Single Rapid IMOvifa 24plus(1-2).Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop DeepISP, a deep learning model that predicts the comprehensive visual field (VF) information of the Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) based on rapid screening perimetry (Imo/TEMPO screening program [ISP]). Design: A retrospective, cross-sectional, and longitudinal cohort database study. Participants: One hundred eighty-seven actual ISPs from 112 patients who underwent both ISP and HFA 24-2 on the same day at the Jikei University School of Medicine Affiliated Hospital and 3470 synthesized ISPs from 883 patients who underwent VF measurements using HFA 24-2 and HFA 10-2 at 4 hospitals affiliated with Jikei University School of Medicine. Methods: We developed 2 variants of multitask neural networks designed to predict both current VF parameters and VF progression parameters. We also evaluated the efficacy of data augmentation to synthesize ISP tests created by combining 20 points from HFA 24-2 and 8 points from HFA 10-2, with thresholding applied to these 28 points. Main Outcome Measures: Mean absolute error for mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI). Mean F1 score for total deviation (TD) and pattern deviation (PD) probability plot classification. Area under the curve (AUC) for MD progression (MD slope <-1.0 decibel/year) and VFI progression (VFI slope <-1.8%/year). Results: DeepISP could predict current VF status. Mean absolute errors for predicting MD, PSD, and VFI were 1.869 ± 0.114, 1.918 ± 0.082, and 5.146 ± 0.487, respectively. The mean F1 scores for pointwise classification of TD and PD probability plots were 0.761 ± 0.002 and 0.775 ± 0.002, respectively. The AUC for classifying glaucoma hemifield test was 0.920 ± 0.008. DeepISP was also capable of predicting VF progression, with AUCs of 0.828 ± 0.060 and 0.832 ± 0.062 for predicting MD and VFI progression, respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrated ISP's versatility and capability in predicting comprehensive VF information, including current severity and progression risk. Our DeepISP serves as an efficient tool for screening and prioritizing patients with glaucoma for clinical intervention using only a single rapid ISP test. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.