Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697381›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Shaping viral immunotherapy towards cancer-targeted immunological cell death.

Anastasia S Isaeva, Adriana D Trujillo Yeriomenko, Esther Idota, Sofya I Volodina, Natalia O Porozova, Evgeny E Bezsonov, Alexander S Malogolovkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anastasia S Isaeva *Molecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Adriana D Trujillo Yeriomenko *Molecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Esther Idota *Molecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Sofya I VolodinaMolecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Natalia O PorozovaMolecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny E BezsonovMolecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Alexander S MalogolovkinMolecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have the ability to efficiently enter, replicate within, and destroy cancer cells. This capacity to selectively target cancer cells while inducing long-term anti-tumor immune responses, makes OVs a promising tool for next-generation cancer therapy. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) induced by OVs initiates the cancer-immunity cycle (CIC) and plays a critical role in activating and reshaping anti-cancer immunity. Genetic engineering, including arming OVs with cancer cell-specific binders and immunostimulatory molecules, further enhances immune responses at various stages of the CIC, improving the specificity and safety of virotherapy.The aim of this study is to update current knowledge in immunotherapy using OVs and to highlight the remarkable plasticity of viruses in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment, which may facilitate anti-cancer treatment through various approaches. Methodology: Research articles, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews were retrieved from PubMed, using the search terms ('Oncolytics' OR 'Immunotherapy' OR 'Virotherapy' OR 'Viral vector') AND 'gene therapy', without language restrictions. Results: In this review, we discuss current strategies aimed at increasing the tumor specificity of OVs and improving their safety. We summarize and functionally categorize different biochemical approaches, with a focus on virus engineering and advancements in immunotherapy. Transduction targeting methods (e.g., xenotype switching, pseudotyping, cell receptor targeting) and non-transduction modifications (e.g., miRNA, optogenetics, transcriptional targeting) are critically reviewed. We also examine the mechanisms of ICD and viral modifications that contribute to efficient cancer cell death and modulation of cancer-specific immunity. Finally, we provide an outlook on promising future oncolytics and approaches with potential therapeutic benefit for the next generation of cancer immunotherapy. Conclusion: Immunogenic cell death induced by oncolytic viruses is a key mediator of potent anti-cancer immunity. The genetic integration of immunostimulatory molecules as regulatory elements into OV genomes significantly enhances their therapeutic potential, safety, and stability. Additionally, therapeutic potency can be further increased by deleting viral genes that inhibit apoptosis, thereby enhancing ICD. However, the synergistic effects of these modifications may vary significantly depending on the cancer type.

Indexed as

cell targetingICDimmunotherapyoncolyticspseudotypingretargetingTIMEvirus engineering

Identifiers

PMID40697381
PMCPMC12280590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.