ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Integrating deep learning and clinical characteristics for early prediction of endometrial cancer using multimodal ultrasound imaging: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- An interpretable multimodal machine learning model integrating transvaginal ultrasound and clinical features for differentiating benign from malignant endometrial thickening in postmenopausal women.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of deep learning tools in medical diagnosis and treatment of cancer: research analysis of clinical and randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting the female reproductive system. It poses significant health risks to women and imposes a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical for improving patient outcomes. While traditional diagnostic methods rely on clinical evaluation and imaging, there is growing interest in leveraging artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning (DL), to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods: This study developed a DL-based predictive model integrating multimodal ultrasound features and clinical risk factors to improve early EC diagnosis. A retrospective, multicenter analysis was conducted using 1,443 multimodal ultrasound images-including two-dimensional (2D) and color Doppler images-from 611 patients, of whom 132 were diagnosed with EC and 479 were non-EC cases. Clinical risk factors such as body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, irregular vaginal bleeding, and hypertension were identified as significant predictors (P < 0.05) and incorporated into a clinical model. Separate DL models were trained on 2D and color Doppler ultrasound images, and their performance was evaluated individually and in combination with the clinical model. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the clinical model was 0.772 (95% CI: 0.690-0.854). The 2D and color Doppler DL models achieved AUCs of 0.792 (95% CI: 0.719-0.864) and 0.813 (95% CI: 0.745-0.881), respectively. When combined with the clinical model, the merged model demonstrated superior predictive performance. In the external validation cohort, the merged model achieved an AUC of 0.892 (95% CI: 0.846-0.938), indicating high diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: The integration of multimodal ultrasound imaging and clinical risk factors using DL significantly enhances the accuracy of endometrial cancer diagnosis. The merged model demonstrated strong generalizability in external validation, underscoring its potential clinical utility. Future studies should focus on larger, prospective multicenter trials to further validate these findings and explore the implementation of this approach in personalized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.