Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697364›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

HCCD: A handwritten camera-captured dataset for document enhancement under varied degradation conditions.

K S Koushik, Bipin Nair B J, N Shobha Rani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K S KoushikDepartment of Computer Science, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Mysuru, India.
Bipin Nair B JDepartment of Computer Science, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Mysuru, India.
N Shobha RaniDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, GITAM School of Technology, Bengaluru, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing degraded handwritten documents captured with smartphone cameras remains a significant challenge in document analysis. Although deep learning-based enhancement techniques have shown promise, the performance of deep learning models largely relies on the availability of meticulously labeled ground truth datasets. To address this gap, in this study, the Handwritten Camera-Captured Dataset (HCCD) is introduced to support document enhancement and recognition tasks specific to real-world scenarios. Unlike existing datasets, which are captured in controlled environments with scanners or smartphone cameras, HCCD features real-time, camera-captured handwritten documents exhibiting a range of natural degradations. The degradation issues encompass motion blur, shadow artifacts, and uneven lighting, which reflect challenges incurred in the real-life document digitization process. In the proposed dataset, each handwritten document is paired with a high-quality enhanced image created through a combination of computer vision-based imaging techniques. The documents are in Roman script and were contributed by multiple individuals with varying handwriting styles. The dataset is valuable for machine learning/ deep learning-based training for image restoration, denoising, and OCR applications. Each sample is annotated with rich metadata for further targeted research, including degradation type, severity level, and writer-specific demographics.

Indexed as

Artifact removalImage restorationMobile scanningNoise reductionOptical character recognition (OCR)

Identifiers

PMID40697364
PMCPMC12281058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.