ReviewSurgery in practice and science2025
Advancements and challenges in robotic surgery: A holistic examination of operational dynamics and future directions.
Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and feasibility of robotic telesurgery in urological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotics in facial plastic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the latest trends and innovations.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Public Perceptions and Determinants of Preference for Robotic-Assisted Surgery in the United Arab Emirates: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- The global surgical workforce crisis: narrative review of the role of surgical educator development and technological innovations.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Surgical Outcomes of Sequential Robot-Assisted Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery in a Single Operating Room: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of a High-Volume Center in Japan (TAKUMI-6).Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- When seconds matter - introducing a surgical salvage strategy by emergency robotic surgery: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Review
- Orthopedic trinity: Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and regenerative orthopedics.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Review
- Augmented and Mixed Reality in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Tele-Robotic Pectopexy Across Cities Using an Indigenous Robotic Platform: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Environmental sustainability in robotic surgery: a data-driven bibliometric mapping of global research trends, thematic evolution, and knowledge structures (1983-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Biportal-RATS vs. Uniportal-VATS for Lung Resections: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis from Early Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Legal Frameworks for AI-driven Diagnostics and Robotic Surgery.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, Robot-Assisted Surgeries (RAS) have advanced significantly, revolutionizing healthcare with better patient outcomes, faster recovery times, and greater surgical accuracy. However, challenges such as restricted maneuverability and communication issues persist, along with the need to evaluate surgeons' proficiency in RAS. Healthcare 5.0 seeks to enhance RAS by integrating technologies like advanced imaging, haptic feedback, and artificial intelligence. Objective: This paper explores the Operational Management of Robotic-Assisted Surgeries (OM-RAS) by analyzing recent research. It assesses surgical robotics operations, workflow optimization, performance enhancement, and skill assessment. Additionally, it examines challenges and gaps in the RAS domain, providing a comprehensive research overview. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering publications up to the third quarter of 2023. Search terms were selected using scientific criteria and validated by experts, resulting in a substantial document collection. A rigorous screening process, aligned with PRISMA 2020 standards, filtered the selection to 50 research papers, forming the foundation for detailed investigation. Findings: OM-RAS is a multidimensional field influenced by emerging technologies that optimize workflows, enhance performance, and improve skill assessment in RAS. Despite superior outcomes, challenges such as implementation costs and seamless technology integration persist. Additionally, research gaps exist regarding RAS benefits, creating opportunities for efficiency enhancement in patient care. Further exploration of RAS procedure scheduling across different surgery types is essential. Conclusion: Integrating advanced technologies into RAS has improved surgical outcomes, shortened hospital stays, and enhanced working environments. This study advocates for a holistic multi-criteria decision-making approach, considering factors like kinematics, imaging, Internet of Things/Tactile Internet (IoT/TI), and AI. It provides valuable insights, guiding future research and shaping OM-RAS studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.