ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Academic metrics and publication history of presenters at the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons closed annual conferences from 2016 to 2022.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) holds annual educational meetings to highlight new advances in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery. This study aims to assess the academic metrics of lecturers, ICL instructors, and moderators at ASES annual meetings. Methods: A review of selected presenters (lecturers, ICL instructors, and moderators) at ASES annual meetings from 2016 to 2022 was performed. Presentation topics were categorized into ten topic-specific content areas. Presenters' Hirsch index (H-index), number of topic-specific publications, and field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) were examined to assess academic metrics. Results: Overall, 348 presenters were evaluated. 76.6% of presentations were provided by physicians with at least 1 prior topic-specific publication. Lecturers and symposium moderators had the highest average proportion of presenters with previous topic-specific publications (81.5%), followed by ICL instructors (72.7%). The most commonly presented content topics included arthroplasty techniques (16.8%), followed by rotator cuff tears (15.9%) and surgical complications (12.4%). Infections-prophylaxis and treatment was the least presented topic (3.1%). Lecturers discussing infection held the highest average FWCI (2.55), while elbow injuries had the highest average H-index (59.6). ICL instructors discussing rotator cuffs had the highest average FWCI (4.7), while ICL instructors on biologics had the highest H-index (58.0). Symposium moderators on infection held the highest average FWCI (2.8), while those discussing nonclinical/orthopedic topics had the highest average H-index (55). Conclusion: A high percentage of ASES presenters had previous topic-specific publications as well as distinguishable H-indices and FWCI. Speakers at ASES annual meetings are academically accomplished within the field of shoulder and elbow surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.