Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697299›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025

The top 50 most cited articles on superior capsular reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.

Mallery Zeiman, Lee Beauchamp, Ryan S Marder, Anthony J Scillia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mallery ZeimanHackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA.
Lee BeauchampHackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA.
Ryan S MarderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA.
Anthony J ScilliaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bibliometric analysis has been used to quantify and assess a scientific publication and its impact. The purpose of this study was to identify and review the top 50 most cited articles discussing superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). Methods: Scopus database was used to search for publications focusing on SCR. The top 50 most cited articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed for year and journal of publication, country of origin, study type, level of evidence, and citation density. Results: The total number of citations from the top 50 articles was 2048 (range, 10-196). The year of publication ranged from 2015 to 2022, with the majority (n = 42) being published from 2018 to 2022. The most common level of evidence rating was level V (21 articles) and the majority (81%) of these articles were surgical technique notes. The second most common level of evidence rating was level IV (16 articles) which were all case series. The articles were written across 16 different countries, most commonly the United States (52%), and published in 16 different journals. Conclusion: Most of the top 50 articles on SCR were technical notes and case series. This demonstrates the need for higher level, comparative, and controlled studies examining SCR techniques, outcomes, and complications in the future.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisIrreparable rotator cuff tearMassive rotator cuff tearSCRSuperior capsular reconstructionTop 50 articles

Identifiers

PMID40697299
PMCPMC12277746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.