ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
The top 50 most cited articles on superior capsular reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bibliometric analysis has been used to quantify and assess a scientific publication and its impact. The purpose of this study was to identify and review the top 50 most cited articles discussing superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). Methods: Scopus database was used to search for publications focusing on SCR. The top 50 most cited articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed for year and journal of publication, country of origin, study type, level of evidence, and citation density. Results: The total number of citations from the top 50 articles was 2048 (range, 10-196). The year of publication ranged from 2015 to 2022, with the majority (n = 42) being published from 2018 to 2022. The most common level of evidence rating was level V (21 articles) and the majority (81%) of these articles were surgical technique notes. The second most common level of evidence rating was level IV (16 articles) which were all case series. The articles were written across 16 different countries, most commonly the United States (52%), and published in 16 different journals. Conclusion: Most of the top 50 articles on SCR were technical notes and case series. This demonstrates the need for higher level, comparative, and controlled studies examining SCR techniques, outcomes, and complications in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.