ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Outcomes after ulnar collateral ligament injuries in non-throwing athletes: a systematic review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries are common among throwing athletes due to the biomechanical forces acting on the elbow during the throwing motion. However, little data exist on UCL injuries in non-throwing athletes. The purpose of this study is to examine the functional outcome and return to sport after operative treatment of UCL injuries in non-throwing athletes and thereby better inform treatment guidelines for this patient population. Methods: This systematic review searched PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until November 1, 2024, for data regarding outcomes after UCL injuries in non-throwing athletes. Article types included case series, retrospective or prospective cohort studies, or randomized controlled trials. Article quality was graded via the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and certainty via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: A total of six "moderate-quality" articles were included out of 945 articles initially retrieved. Non-throwing athletes (n = 95) had a frequency-weighted mean age of 19.9 ± 3.7 years with a frequency-weighted mean follow-up of 54.7 ± 2.4 months. Eleven sports were represented across four levels of competition from middle school to the professional level. From four studies, about 86% of athletes (n = 48 out of 56 athletes) returned to sport at the same or higher competitive level after operative treatment. Overall, patients had good functional outcomes at follow-up. Non-throwing athletes also had complication rates ranging from 0% to 18%, with only 2% of patients requiring a return to the operating room. Conclusion: There is limited evidence available for outcomes in non-throwing athletes after UCL injury. However, the currently available research suggests that 86% of athletes may return to sport at the same or higher level and enjoy good functional outcomes with low complication rates. Additional research is needed to guide treatment for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.