ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Female athletes have high return to sport and low complication rates following ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair or reconstruction: a systematic review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypothesis and background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries can be caused by repetitive microtrauma, particularly in throwers and overhead athletes or from acute elbow trauma-producing excessive valgus stress. The current literature is male-dominated and may be a misguiding diagnosis and treatment of female UCL injuries, which are often traumatic or unrelated to overhead throwing. We hypothesized that UCL repair and reconstruction in female athletes are safe and effective procedures that enhance patients' ability to return to sports (RTS) with an acceptably low complication rate. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in July 2024 for studies published after 2000. Studies were included if they evaluated female athletes of any age range or level of competition who underwent UCL reconstruction or repair, reported RTS rates, complications, or reoperations and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up time. Results: The initial screen identified 116 studies, 4 of which were included in this systematic review. Each study had a retrospective study design with sufficiently low risk of bias. A total of 49 patients, all female, were included in this study. The mean age ranged from 15.3 to 22.2 years. Seventeen patients in 3 studies underwent UCL reconstruction. In addition, 2 studies included a total of 32 patients who underwent UCL repair. Numerous sports were represented in this study, the most popular of which were gymnastics, softball, and cheerleading. There was a cumulative 11.8% complication rate in UCL reconstruction patients and 3.1% cumulative complication rate in UCL repair patients. RTS rates for UCL repair and UCL reconstruction ranged from 86.7% to 94.1% and 33.3% to 76.9%, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: UCL repair is an effective procedure in helping female athletes RTS with low complication rates. However, UCL reconstruction has more variable RTS rates in female athletes. Surgeons should be aware of the specific risk factors for UCL injury associated with women's sports, and treatment should be tailored to each athlete's specific goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.