ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improves functional outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 3 years.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) using a single-row technique and compare functional outcomes before and after surgery at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed the functional outcomes of 38 patients who underwent ARCR with a single-row technique between 2015 and 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. In all procedures, the repair was medialized just lateral to the articular cartilage with bone tunneling on the footprint (crimson duvet). Functional outcomes were evaluated from the visual analog scale score, muscle strength, range of motion, Constant-Murley Score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, which were compared before and after surgery. Results: All cases had medium and large supraspinatus tears with a median age of 60 years (40-77 years). As much as 68% of tears were in the dominant hand, and most of the cases (79%) were of nontraumatic origin. Additional procedures such as acromioplasty (26%), biceps tenodesis (8%), and biceps tenotomy (18%) were done in addition to tendon repair. Women were dominant in all cases (58%). There was a significant improvement in the median visual analog scale score (8-1), muscle power, and range of motion when comparing the results before and after ARCR. Functional American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Constant-Murley Score also significantly improved from 50 to 91 and 46 to 85, respectively ( Conclusion: ARCR with a single-row technique provides good results for medium and large tears in 3 years of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.