ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic cancer.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound, MRI, and CT for preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis under a graded reference standard.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for evaluating mediastinal pathologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
- The Triage Role of Transabdominal Ultrasonography (TAUS) in the Diagnostic Management of Pancreatic and Distal Biliary Pathologies: A Comparative Efficacy Analysis with Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is recognized as one of the leading causes of cancer mortality, representing the second most common source of cancer-related deaths within the gastrointestinal domain. Surgical resection is currently the only definitive treatment; however, the subtle emergence of symptoms often leads to a diagnosis at an advanced stage, with merely 10%-15% of patients being eligible for surgical intervention. The primary obstacle to achieving a potential radical resection is the presence of distant metastatic disease or invasion of adjacent major vascular structures. This review aims to highlight the critical role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science by using 'pancreatic cancer' and 'endoscopic ultrasonography' as keywords. Relevant studies were reviewed and analyzed. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is efficient in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer, past studies reported the accuracy of EUS is 63% to 94% for T-staging and 44% to 82% for N-staging but there are still limitations that need to be comprehensively applied with other diagnostic methods to evaluation of distant metastasis for surgical resectability. Our review aims to reveal the value for the staging of pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.