Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697233›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic cancer.

Xin Yang, Nan Ge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Nan GeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. nge@cmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is recognized as one of the leading causes of cancer mortality, representing the second most common source of cancer-related deaths within the gastrointestinal domain. Surgical resection is currently the only definitive treatment; however, the subtle emergence of symptoms often leads to a diagnosis at an advanced stage, with merely 10%-15% of patients being eligible for surgical intervention. The primary obstacle to achieving a potential radical resection is the presence of distant metastatic disease or invasion of adjacent major vascular structures. This review aims to highlight the critical role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science by using 'pancreatic cancer' and 'endoscopic ultrasonography' as keywords. Relevant studies were reviewed and analyzed. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is efficient in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer, past studies reported the accuracy of EUS is 63% to 94% for T-staging and 44% to 82% for N-staging but there are still limitations that need to be comprehensively applied with other diagnostic methods to evaluation of distant metastasis for surgical resectability. Our review aims to reveal the value for the staging of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Diagnostic valueEndoscopic ultrasoundPancreatic cancerStaging

Identifiers

PMID40697233
PMCPMC12278258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.