Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696813›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025

Sex differences in modifiable dementia risk factors: Findings from the Rush Memory and Aging Project.

Jissa Martin, Emily Hannah Gordon, Natasha Reid, Ruth Eleanor Hubbard, David Denston Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex differences in modifiable dementia risk factors: Findings from the Rush Memory and Aging Project.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jissa MartinCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Emily Hannah GordonCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Natasha ReidCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Ruth Eleanor HubbardCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
David Denston WardCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) for incident dementia and examine sex differences in individuals with no cognitive impairment (NCI) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsLongitudinal data from the Rush University Memory and Aging Project (MAP) were analyzed. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate covariate-adjusted hazard ratios for incident dementia and calculate weighted PAFs within each cognitive status/sex subgroup.

resultsThe analytical sample comprised 1481 NCI (76.7% female) and 515 MCI (69.7% female) participants. Overall PAFs were similar for NCI (18.2%) and MCI (18.6%) subgroups, however, sex differences were evident. Males had higher PAFs than females in both NCI (42.5% vs. 25.1%) and MCI (51.5% vs. 12.4%), with differing risk factor profiles. DISCUSSION: These findings support the notion that dementia risk is modifiable after the onset of MCI and that the number of potentially preventable dementia cases may be higher in males than in females. HIGHLIGHTS: The proportion of potentially preventable dementia cases was similar for no cognitive impairment (NCI) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) individuals. For both cognitive states, a higher proportion of potentially preventable dementia cases was observed in males compared to females. The profiles of modifiable risk factors contributing to dementia differed between males and females. Lifestyle related risk factors were more prominent contributors to preventable dementia in males. Psychosocial risk factors, such as depression and social isolation, were important contributors in females.

Indexed as

AgingCognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsSex Factorsdementiamild cognitive impairmentmodifiable risk factorspopulation attributable fractionssex differences

Identifiers

PMID40696813
PMCPMC12284317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.