Trial reportClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Profiling a Neo-Antigen-Driven Immune Response in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the KLH Challenge Model.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel compounds targeting the adaptive immune system are commonly initially investigated in healthy volunteers (HV). HV frequently lack constitutively expressed drug-target engagement biomarkers, complicating the evaluation of pharmacological activity. The keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) neo-antigen challenge elicits a controlled immune response in HV and is a potential model for investigating compounds targeting the adaptive immune system. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in HV was conducted, investigating the effects of repeated immunizations with KLH on Days 1, 15, and 29, followed by intradermal KLH administration on Day 50. Systemically, KLH-specific antibodies were evaluated. Leukocytes were stimulated ex vivo to determine KLH-specific responses using ELISpot. Locally, KLH skin response was evaluated 0-48 hours post intradermal administration, using imaging, suction blister fluid analysis, and biopsy analysis. Twelve male HV aged 18-42 years completed the study. KLH antibody levels increased incrementally. ELISpot analyses demonstrated KLH-specific IFN-γ and IL-13 responses. Intradermal KLH injection drove a peak response 24 h after administration, observed as erythema and increased perfusion. Blister fluid analysis showed cell influx (T cells; B cells; monocytes; dendritic cells) at 24 h, largely decreasing at 48 h, as confirmed by immunofluorescent staining of skin biopsies. These findings demonstrate a T-cell-mediated response to intradermal KLH that is more rapid than the classical delayed-type hypersensitivity response. This study highlights the importance of the timing of measurements and combining non-invasive and invasive biomarkers. The KLH neo-antigen challenge model presented in this study offers a framework to study the effect of novel immunomodulatory compounds on the adaptive immune system early in clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.