ReviewMedicine2025
Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor in a pediatric patient: A case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleDentinogenic ghost cell tumors (DGCTs) are rare odontogenic neoplasms constituting the solid variant of calcifying odontogenic cysts. Predominantly observed in adults, DGCTs are exceptionally rare in pediatric patients. This case report aims to contribute to the limited literature by presenting the clinical, radiographic, and histopathological findings of a pediatric patient with a DGCT and emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 14-year-old male presented with facial asymmetry in the left mandible. DIAGNOSES: Diagnostic imaging revealed a multilocular radiolucent lesion with impacted teeth, cortical expansion, and root resorption. Histopathological evaluation confirmed the DGCT diagnosis.
interventionsThe lesion was treated conservatively with enucleation and curettage, followed by a 3-year follow-up. OUTCOMES: Regular follow-ups demonstrated progressive bone regeneration with no evidence of recurrence. No postoperative complications were observed. LESSONS: Because of their high recurrence rate and potential for transformation into dentinogenic ghost cell carcinoma, early diagnosis and long-term follow-up are crucial for effective management in DGCT cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.