ArticleMedicine2025
Research on medical errors exhibits diverse associations with global indicators of science, development, and health across geographic regions: A scientometrics study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Oxygen Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit: Matching Oxygen Exposure to Patient Phenotypes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Measuring scientific coherence between global neglected tropical disease research and population health indicators: a 25-year meta-research study.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Estimating scientific coherence using population-level indicators and research production data: a longitudinal analytical proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical errors are a major public health concern, contributing to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Understanding the global research landscape on medical errors and its association with key health and development indicators can provide insights into gaps and opportunities for improving patient safety.
methodsA scientometrics analysis was conducted using data from Scopus, PubMed, and other bibliographic databases. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating bibliometric indicators with global health and research metrics. Regression models and meta-analyses were applied to evaluate associations between research productivity and health indicators across 6 World Health Organization regions.
resultsA total of 2639 articles on medical errors were analyzed. The Americas produced the highest volume of research (48.01% of publications) with the highest citation impact (mean 46.5 citations per article). In contrast, Africa had the lowest research output (0.87%). Significant associations were observed between medical error research productivity and health indicators, including reductions in adolescent mortality (Coef. = -3676.56, P < .001) in the Western Pacific and under-5 mortality (Coef. = -0.18, P < .001) in the Americas. Each region showed a distinct pattern of associations with the global indicators. Research funding and health expenditure were positively associated with publication output and citation impact.
conclusionMedical error research exhibits regional disparities and significant associations with global health indicators. Investment in medical errors research is associated with improved health outcomes in some regions, underscoring the need for equitable resource allocation and enhanced international collaboration to address gaps in patient safety research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.