Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696646›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2025

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of filmarray multiplex PCR system in bloodstream infections: A comparative study with conventional methods in a tertiary health care setting.

İsmail Selçuk Aygar, Tuğrul Hoşbul

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

İsmail Selçuk AygarMedical Microbiology Laboratory, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Keçiören, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-3508
Tuğrul HoşbulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0150-4417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prompt identification of the causative microorganism responsible for bloodstream infections (BSIs) is paramount, as is the determination of its resistance profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel for BSIs compared to conventional methods (CTMs) and its impact on antimicrobial treatment decisions. The study included 93 positive blood cultures from 85 patients with suspected BSI between January and August 2024. The BCID2 system demonstrated an accuracy of 90.32% in identifying positive samples in culture. The analytical sensitivity was calculated to be 83.72%, while the clinical sensitivity was determined to be 77.41% at the sample level. The highest concordance at the isolate level was observed for Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and Acinetobacter baumannii, with a 100% concordance rate. The compatibility of the method with conventional techniques was found in 85.13% of monomicrobial samples and 47.36% of polymicrobial samples. The mean time to result was determined as 1 day and 4 hours for BCID2 and 2 days and 4 hours for CTMs to identification; the difference was found to be significant. With regard to the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, a 73.46% concordance was observed between BCID2 and conventional phenotypic methods at the sample level. While the presence of resistance was detected phenotypically in A. baumannii isolates, this could not be demonstrated genotypically with BCID2. In treatment simulations for antimicrobial stewardship, 91.5% of correct treatment arrangements were achieved according to the Norwegian guideline. Furthermore, an examination of the impact of gram stain pattern on diagnostic agreement revealed 90% agreement in anaerobic bottles, 77.77% in pediatric bottles, and 73.43% in aerobic bottles. However, these differences were not found to be statistically significant. Conversely, a significant difference in agreement rates was observed according to gram stain pattern, with 94.1% agreement observed in gram-positive cocci and 79.1% in gram-negative bacilli, yielding a statistically significant difference. BCID2 has the potential to improve clinical decision-making processes in the management of BSIs with its rapid diagnosis time, high specificity, and resistance detection capacity; however, due to its current limitations, it is currently best used as a supportive tool to CTMs.

Indexed as

BacteremiaMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAcinetobacter baumanniiAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CultureFemaleHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTertiary Health CareAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistancebloodstream infectionrapid molecular diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID40696646
PMCPMC12282700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.