ArticleMedicine2025
Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative management of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological conditions.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Best evidence summary of non-pharmacological interventions for postoperative abdominal distension in gynecological laparoscopic.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Low-dose esketamine for postoperative fatigue after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Surgical management of endometriosis: indications, patient preparation, and perioperative planning: Number 6 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Article
- Effects of comprehensive nursing interventions on pain, recovery, and sexual quality of life in patients with adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic gynecological surgery and its impact on perioperative management. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 187 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery at Guangyuan Central Hospital between November 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 92 patients were enrolled in the ERAS group, and 95 were assigned to the conventional care group. The ERAS protocol included evidence-based interventions such as shortened fasting duration, carbohydrate loading, avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, and early postoperative mobilization. Primary endpoints included stress response markers (serum cortisol, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), nutritional parameters (prealbumin, albumin, blood urea nitrogen), and clinical outcomes (time to gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay). Secondary endpoints comprised postoperative complications, healthcare costs, and patient satisfaction. The ERAS group showed significantly faster gastrointestinal recovery (first flatus: 15.54 ± 1.73 vs 21.24 ± 3.53 hours, P < .001), shorter hospitalization (4.91 ± 0.90 vs 6.29 ± 1.25 days, P < .001), and lower healthcare costs (13,960 ± 1967 vs 15,270 ± 2856 yuan, P < .001). Postoperative stress response was reduced (cortisol, P = .012), and nutritional parameters were better preserved (P < .001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the ERAS group (100% vs 96.8%, P = .042). The ERAS protocol significantly optimizes perioperative management for patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, reducing hospital stay, lowering complication rates, and enhancing patient satisfaction, thus providing robust evidence for clinical implementation. However, further research is needed to explore its long-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.