Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696632›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative management of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological conditions.

Rouzi Nuermanguli, Deng Jing, Yan JiangYing, Hou Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Surgical management of endometriosis: indications, patient preparation, and perioperative planning: Number 6 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rouzi NuermanguliDepartment of Gynecology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0250-9700
Deng Jing
Yan JiangYing
Hou Yu

Funding

Project of Guangyuan Science and Technology Bureau NO.22ZDYF0086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic gynecological surgery and its impact on perioperative management. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 187 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery at Guangyuan Central Hospital between November 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 92 patients were enrolled in the ERAS group, and 95 were assigned to the conventional care group. The ERAS protocol included evidence-based interventions such as shortened fasting duration, carbohydrate loading, avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, and early postoperative mobilization. Primary endpoints included stress response markers (serum cortisol, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), nutritional parameters (prealbumin, albumin, blood urea nitrogen), and clinical outcomes (time to gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay). Secondary endpoints comprised postoperative complications, healthcare costs, and patient satisfaction. The ERAS group showed significantly faster gastrointestinal recovery (first flatus: 15.54 ± 1.73 vs 21.24 ± 3.53 hours, P < .001), shorter hospitalization (4.91 ± 0.90 vs 6.29 ± 1.25 days, P < .001), and lower healthcare costs (13,960 ± 1967 vs 15,270 ± 2856 yuan, P < .001). Postoperative stress response was reduced (cortisol, P = .012), and nutritional parameters were better preserved (P < .001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the ERAS group (100% vs 96.8%, P = .042). The ERAS protocol significantly optimizes perioperative management for patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, reducing hospital stay, lowering complication rates, and enhancing patient satisfaction, thus providing robust evidence for clinical implementation. However, further research is needed to explore its long-term effects.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryGenital Diseases, FemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyPerioperative CareAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studiesclinical outcomesenhanced recovery after surgerylaparoscopic gynecological surgerynutritional statusperioperative carestress response

Identifiers

PMID40696632
PMCPMC12282710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.