ArticleMedicine2025
Mendelian randomization analysis of C-reactive protein on septic arthritis risk.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several observational studies have shown that C-reactive protein (CRP) is an effective biomarker for evaluating septic arthritis (SA). However, the inherent causal relationship of this connection has not yet been clarified. Thus, this study examined the potential causal association between CRP and SA risk using 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). The analysis used 2-sample MR, with the exposure and outcome data from the Genome-Wide Association Study Catalog and FinnGen, respectively. Throughout this study, inverse variance weighting has been used as the primary method. To assess the robustness of the research findings, Cochran Q test, Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier global tests were conducted. Genetically predicted CRP has a positive causal relationship with the risk of SA (ORinverse variance weighting = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.63, P < .001), (ORMR Egger = 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.19, P = .002), (ORweighted media = 1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.97, P = .008), and (ORMR PRESSO = 1.37, 95% CI 1.18-1.59, P < .001). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this result. Our study has, for the first time, established a definite causal relationship between CRP and SA risk; that is, an increase in CRP levels leads to an increase in SA risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.