Observational studyMedicine2025
The assessment of pulmonary impairment and clinical correlations in patients survived from SARS-CoV-2 infection: A 3-month follow-up study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the extent of pulmonary impairment associated with initial clinical parameters remained controversial. The notion is valuable for the recovery and prognosis of COVID-19. This study investigated the long-term pulmonary sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, focusing on pulmonary function and clinical parameters during the 3 months after diagnosis. This is a retrospective, single-center observational study of 229 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and made the 3rd-month follow-up visit between June 2020 and May 2021. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and treatment outcomes were recorded. The obstructive, restrictive pulmonary dysfunction patterns were analyzed to associate with the radiological findings, disease severity, and clinical parameters. The median age of the patients was 46 years. The most common residual symptoms were dyspnea (38%), dry cough (34.5%), and fatigue (29.4%). The obstructive and restrictive pulmonary dysfunction patterns were observed in 38.9% and 2.2% of the patients, respectively. Two-fifth of patients had some form of pulmonary dysfunction. A significant rate (35.8%) of patients had reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide values. Obstructive pulmonary dysfunction was more common among older patients, whereas hypertension was more common among patients with extended hospital stays. Long-term pulmonary dysfunction was a frequent complication in patients recovering from severe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Understanding these long-term effects is essential for providing appropriate medical care for COVID-19 survivors. Therefore, further research is needed to elucidate the postinfection changes in the lung.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.