ArticleMedicine2025
Exploring the causal relationship between serum uric acid and gastrointestinal cancer based on Mendelian randomization studies and bioinformatics approaches.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent observational studies show a correlation between serum uric acid (SUA) levels and colorectal and gastric cancers (CRC and GC). It is unclear, nevertheless, what the biological mechanisms and causation of these connections are. Using summary data from the genome-wide association study, we analyzed 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was the main technique for determining causality. The weighted median, weighted mode, MR-Egger, Wald ratio, and IVW were employed to investigate the causal link between SUA and GC/CRC. To evaluate weak instrumental variable (IV) bias, F-statistics were computed. Using MR-PRESSO, outliers were found and removed. Cochran Q test, MR-Egger test, and leave-one-out approach were employed to find heterogeneity and stability in MR results. Ultimately, bioinformatics investigations were carried out to investigate plausible biological pathways linking GC/CRC and SUA. According to IVW data, SUA dramatically lowered the chance of GC (OR = 0.804, 95% Cl: 0.700-0.922, P = .002). There was no discernible cause-and-effect connection between SUA and CRC (OR = 0.999, 95% Cl: 0.997-1.000, P = .080). Furthermore, the reliability of the multiple validity and heterogeneity tests demonstrated the validity of the MR data. A total of 10 hub genes were found, with the majority of them being enriched in the AMPK signaling pathway, lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism, and cholesterol metabolism. This study indicates that SUA lowers the chance of developing GC, regardless of the risk of acquiring CRC. The link between SUA and GC could be due to several metabolic processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.