Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696516›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology2025

A Comparison of the Force-Velocity Relationship of Bonobo and Human Muscle Fibers.

Hans Degens, Maarten Bobbert, Melanie Scholz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hans DegensDepartment of Life Sciences, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Maarten BobbertFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Melanie ScholzKinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been reported that the muscles of chimpanzees and bonobos have "super strength" and it has been suggested that this is attributable to a larger specific tension and specific power of their muscles. To investigate this we compared the force-velocity relationship in 85 human and 49 bonobo (Pan paniscus) skinned fibers at 15°C. Fibers were classified as type I or II with gel electrophoresis. Type II fibers had a higher maximal shortening velocity (Vmax) and lower curvature of the force-velocity relationship (higher a/Po) than type I fibers in both species (p < 0.001). Although bonobo fibers of both types were larger and produced more force than human fibers, their specific tension and Vmax were lower (p < 0.001). The a/Po was higher in bonobo fibers (p < 0.001). Combined these differences in the parameters of the force-velocity relationship resulted in a similar specific power in bonobo and human fibers. The lesser curvature of the force-velocity relationship offsets the negative effects of a lower specific tension and Vmax on specific power of bonobo muscle fibers. The "super strength" of bonobos cannot be explained by differences in muscle fiber contractile properties but may reflect a higher proportion of type II fibers than in human muscle.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionMuscle Fibers, SkeletalPan paniscusAdultAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleSpecies Specificitycurvature of the force‐velocity relationshipmuscle functionpowerprimatesingle fibersspecific tension

Identifiers

PMID40696516
PMCPMC12484415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.