Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696514›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2025

Classifying the Integration of Healthcare Providers and Insurers.

Xiaodan Liang, John Mullahy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaodan LiangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5681-6285
John MullahyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8605-3899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value-based payment reform prompted by the Affordable Care Act has stimulated vertical integrations of healthcare providers and insurers. The consequences of these integrations may vary significantly depending on the markets and entities involved. This article points out the limitations of familiar binary classifications for provider-insurer integrations in prior studies. To address these limitations, we propose a framework and taxonomy that include four key aspects for examining variations in provider-insurer integrations. The first is from the care delivery perspective; it sheds light on levels of care services owned by an integrated system and their variation across regions within the system. The second is from the insurance markets' perspective; it pertains to insurance markets in which an integrated system competes. The third is from the organizational perspective; it points out that whether the insurer or the provider is dominant in an integrated system may affect the system's priorities-care delivery reform or cost containment. The last highlights the dynamics of integrated systems that can involve the other three. We offer these insights and their possible applications hoping to sharpen discussion and research on provider-insurer integrations, and to assist antitrust agencies in evaluating relevant legal cases under the 2023 Merger Guidelines.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth PersonnelInsurance CarriersInsurance, HealthHealth Care ReformHumansPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActUnited Stateshealthcareinsurerprovidervertical integration

Identifiers

PMID40696514
PMCPMC12496020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.