ArticlePsychological medicine2025
Leveraging stacked classifiers for exploring the role of hedonic processing between major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnhedonia, a transdiagnostic feature common to both Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Schizophrenia (SCZ), is characterized by abnormalities in hedonic experience. Previous studies have used machine learning (ML) algorithms without focusing on disorder-specific characteristics to independently classify SCZ and MDD. This study aimed to classify MDD and SCZ using ML models that integrate components of hedonic processing.
methodsWe recruited 99 patients with MDD, 100 patients with SCZ, and 113 healthy controls (HC) from four sites. The patient groups were allocated to distinct training and testing datasets. All participants completed a modified Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task, which yielded features categorized into five hedonic components, two reward consequences, and three reward magnitudes. We employed a stacking ensemble model with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to identify key features distinguishing MDD, SCZ, and HC across binary and multi-class classifications.
resultsThe stacking model demonstrated high classification accuracy, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 96.08% (MDD versus HC) and 91.77% (SCZ versus HC) in the main dataset. However, the MDD versus SCZ classification had an AUC of 57.75%. The motivation reward component, loss reward consequence, and high reward magnitude were the most influential features within respective categories for distinguishing both MDD and SCZ from HC (
conclusionThe stacking model effectively classified SCZ and MDD from HC, contributing to understanding transdiagnostic mechanisms of anhedonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.