Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696513›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2025

Leveraging stacked classifiers for exploring the role of hedonic processing between major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.

Yating Huang, Jiayu He, Xinyue Zhang, Ji Chen, Zhenghui Yi, Qinyu Lv, Chao Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yating HuangSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, https://ror.org/02n96ep67East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayu HeSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, https://ror.org/02n96ep67East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xinyue ZhangSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, https://ror.org/02n96ep67East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Ji ChenCenter for Brain Health and Brain Technology, Global Institute of Future Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenghui YiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qinyu LvShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chao YanSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, https://ror.org/02n96ep67East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0327-9321

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China 32171084National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201658National Natural Science Foundation of China 82371506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnhedonia, a transdiagnostic feature common to both Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Schizophrenia (SCZ), is characterized by abnormalities in hedonic experience. Previous studies have used machine learning (ML) algorithms without focusing on disorder-specific characteristics to independently classify SCZ and MDD. This study aimed to classify MDD and SCZ using ML models that integrate components of hedonic processing.

methodsWe recruited 99 patients with MDD, 100 patients with SCZ, and 113 healthy controls (HC) from four sites. The patient groups were allocated to distinct training and testing datasets. All participants completed a modified Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task, which yielded features categorized into five hedonic components, two reward consequences, and three reward magnitudes. We employed a stacking ensemble model with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to identify key features distinguishing MDD, SCZ, and HC across binary and multi-class classifications.

resultsThe stacking model demonstrated high classification accuracy, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 96.08% (MDD versus HC) and 91.77% (SCZ versus HC) in the main dataset. However, the MDD versus SCZ classification had an AUC of 57.75%. The motivation reward component, loss reward consequence, and high reward magnitude were the most influential features within respective categories for distinguishing both MDD and SCZ from HC (

conclusionThe stacking model effectively classified SCZ and MDD from HC, contributing to understanding transdiagnostic mechanisms of anhedonia.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaMachine LearningMajor Depressive DisorderSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRewardYoung Adultanhedoniamachine learningmajor depressive disorderreward processingschizophreniastacking model

Identifiers

PMID40696513
PMCPMC12315667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.