ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025
Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of osteoarthritis, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of manual therapy targeting hamstring tightness in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of rehabilitation outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Cryogel-based therapeutic platforms for disease modification in osteoarthritis.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Article
- Gene Profiling Analyses of Synovium Tissues in Korean Osteoarthritis Patients.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet global estimates of lifetime risk remain limited. This study aims to provide comprehensive global, regional, and national lifetime risk estimates for OA, including knee, hand, and hip subtypes, from 1990 to 2021.
methodsUsing data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021, we estimated the lifetime risk of developing OA from age 20 onwards, stratified by sex, location, and Socio-demographic Index (SDI). Average annual percentage change (AAPC) was also calculated. Spatial heterogeneity in 2021 lifetime risks and their AAPCs was evaluated using the Factor Detector of the Geographic Detector method, with q-statistics quantifying the explanatory power of demographic, socioeconomic, health system and OA-related risk factors.
resultsIn 2021, the global lifetime risk of OA was 14.21% (95% confidence interval: 14.21%, 14.22%), with knee OA at 9.31% (95% CI: 9.31%, 9.32%), hand OA at 3.45% (95% CI: 3.45%, 3.46%), and hip OA at 0.71% (95% CI: 0.71%, 0.71%). Lifetime risk increased with higher socio-demographic Index (SDI), from 11.62% in low-SDI regions to 16.10% in high-SDI regions. The highest risk was observed in the High-income Asia Pacific region (18.10%), led by the Republic of Korea (21.20%). Between 1990 and 2021, global lifetime OA risk increased with an AAPC of 0.30% (95% CI: 0.30%, 0.30%), with the most notable increases in East Asia (AAPC: 0.53%). Spatial heterogeneity analysis revealed that the historical proportions employed in agriculture and with upper secondary education had the strongest associations with 2021 lifetime risks and their trends (q-statistics up to 0.84), followed by life expectancy, SDI, and health-system indicators.
conclusionsIn 2021, 1 in 7 individuals globally were projected to develop OA, with the highest risks in high-SDI regions. The steady rise in OA risk, especially in East Asia, highlights the need for targeted public health strategies that focus on prevention, early diagnosis, and ensuring equitable access to treatment to mitigate the increasing OA burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.