ArticleBMC chemistry2025
Prediction and optimization of Rhodamine B removal from water using metal-organic frameworks: RSM-CCD, ANN, non-linear kinetics, and isotherm studies.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-affinity phosphate capture on MgO/Mg(OH)RSC advances · 2026Article
- Nanostructured and bio based high performance adsorbents for the purification of water and food matrices from emerging contaminants.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of ANFIS, ANN, and BBD for enhanced prediction of methyl orange adsorption in water treatment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Synthesis and characterization of trimetallic (CuNiZn-PDC) MOF for the effective remediation of Rhodamine B dye.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Activated carbon from banana peels for alizarin removal: understanding the adsorption process through isotherms, kinetics, and predictive modeling.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- Simultaneous antimicrobial and adsorptive capabilities of a novel surface-modified NHScientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study involved the chemical synthesis of Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs). The synthesized MOFs were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR), and Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). Artificial intelligence models such as Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to predict and optimize the adsorptive removal of Rhodamine B (RhB) from water. The adsorption process was optimized using RSM with a Central Composite Design (CCD), which predicted a maximum removal efficiency of 95.91% under the following conditions: initial dye concentration (10 mg/L), adsorbent dosage (15 mg), pH (6), and temperature (25 °C). ANN was also optimized using similar conditions and the resulting predictive removal efficiency of 97.18% was obtained. Non-linear isotherm studies strongly correlated with the Freundlich (R² = 0.9987) and Sips (R² = 0.9928) models, indicating multilayer and monolayer adsorption. Non-linear Pseudo-first-order, Pseudo-second-order, and Elovich model correlation coefficients of 0.9644, 0.9998, and 0.952 suggested that the mechanisms were by chemisorption and physisorption on energetically stable heterogeneous surfaces. The findings of this study show a dual approach based on metal-organic framework and machine learning models as efficient alternatives to understanding the removal of RhB from water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.