SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2025
Global colorectal cancer screening programs and coverage rate estimation: an evidence synthesis.
Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Integrated Care to Promote Colonoscopy Uptake in China: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
AI-empowered Nudge to Improve Colonoscopy Uptake (AINC): A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- Forecasting colorectal cancer screening in Japan: regional and sex disparities threaten national targets.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Long-term effectiveness of a two-step colorectal cancer screening strategy and risk of colorectal cancer after polypectomy.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer screening awareness among rural populations in Northern China.BMC public health · 2026Observational
- Combining genome-wide polygenic scores with registry data for colorectal cancer risk-based screening.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Access or Engagement: The Potential Role of Financial Incentives in Colorectal Cancer Screening.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Gender Oncology: Rethinking Cancer Through a Sex- and Gender-Based Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Population-based screening colonoscopy in Korea: balancing benefits and limitations.Intestinal research · 2026Review
- A global scoping review of interventions to increase participation in screening programmes for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2025.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Cancer burden among adults aged 65 years and older in Asia, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.npj aging · 2026Article
- The colorectal cancer screening gap in Türkiye: A tripartite survey of barriers among patients and surgeons.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Health Equity After a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Fecal Immunochemical Test and Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Real-World Practice: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of Newly Introduced Population-Based Screening and the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Characteristics: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Emergency cancer diagnosis in older adults: patterns, subgroups, and implications for health-care quality metrics.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- An analysis of the burden of colorectal cancer caused by high body mass index in 204 countries and regions worldwide from 1990 to 2023.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- The Barrier-Microbiota-Inflammation Axis in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Emerging Diagnostic & Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extending risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: evidence from China's first province-wide program.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Inhibition of big challenge of cancer screening in various societies: what is debatable and significant?Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Screening is effective in reducing the disease burden of colorectal cancer, with participation and coverage rates being key determinants of its effectiveness. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of colorectal cancer screening program characteristics and global screening coverage rates. We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to March 2025. Grey literature was obtained from screening program websites and relevant reports. Studies reporting nationwide colorectal cancer screening coverage were eligible for our analysis. A comprehensive overview of essential information and the most recent coverage rates for global screening programs were reported. Temporal trend analyses of coverage rates and subgroup analyses by sex and age were performed. Our results encompassed 45 countries with established national screening programs, among which 33 of them having retrieved coverage rates. Population-based screening programs were predominantly conducted in Europe (25/39), with fecal occult blood testing being the most commonly used modality (38/39). The reported latest screening coverage rates varied greatly across countries, ranging from 1.0% (China, 2020) to 79.4% (Finland, 2021). The coverage of screening program differed slightly between men and women in most countries (men: IQR, 25.3-52.7%; women: IQR, 23.0-65.1%), and coverage increased with age. Temporal trend analysis in 14 countries showed that the majority exhibited increasing or stable screening coverage rates. These findings highlight significant disparities in CRC screening implementation worldwide. Targeted efforts to improve participation and expand coverage are essential, particularly in countries with a high disease burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.