ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Exploring bladder cancer through urinary microbiota: innovative "urinetypes" classification and establishment of a diagnostic model.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiomic profiling links L1 retrotransposition to genomic instability and ecDNA in bladder cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Identification of a weighted urinary microbial signature for bladder cancer discrimination.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Urinary microbiota in bladder cancer: insights into pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Metagenomics and metabolomics analyses of the mechanism of non-expression of natural mating behavior in captive male Malayan pangolins (Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Research advances on the urinary microbiome in non-infectious urinary tract diseases: from community composition to clinical prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Metabolite-mediated mechanisms linking the urinary microbiome to bladder cancer.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Anticancer Potential of the Multistrain Probiotic FormulationAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer (BCa) is a prevalent and lethal malignancy of the urinary system. Recent evidence suggests a strong association between the urinary microbiota and the pathogenesis, progression, and prognosis of BCa. This study investigated the role of the urinary microbiota in BCa, aiming to develop a non-invasive diagnostic model based on microbial biomarkers. Additionally, we proposed a novel urine-based microbiota classification method to enhance diagnostic accuracy and guide treatment strategies.
methodsThe study included a discovery cohort (104 BCa patients, 56 with Other Malignant Urological Cancer, 98 with benign urinary diseases, and 42 healthy controls) and a validation cohort (66 BCa patients, 5 with Other Malignant Urological Cancer, 51 with benign urinary diseases, and 22 healthy controls). The urinary microbiota composition was analyzed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing to assess diversity, identify biomarkers, and construct a diagnostic model for BCa. Finally, clustering analysis was used to establish "Urinetypes".
resultsBCa patients exhibited greater richness and diversity in their urinary microbiota, with significant differences in beta diversity observed across the groups. Genera such as Sphingomonas, Anaerococcus, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Aeromonas, and Novosphingobium were more abundant in BCa patients, while Lactobacillus and Gardnerella were less abundant, suggesting their potential as biomarkers. PICRUSt analysis revealed significant enrichment in carbohydrate and nucleotide metabolism in BCa patients, reflecting the increased metabolic demands of cancer cells. A biomarker prediction model employing random forest analysis based on 12 microbial genera achieved high accuracy in the discovery cohort (AUC = 89.08%) and demonstrated robust performance in the validation cohort (AUC = 70.8%). To facilitate potential clinical application, we developed a "Patient Differentiation Index" (PDI), which maintained predictive efficiency in both the discovery cohort (AUC = 86.17%) and the validation cohort (AUC = 78%). Additionally, we identified distinct "Urinetypes", including those dominated by Prevotella and Corynebacterium, which were more prevalent in BCa patients and might represent high-risk subtypes.
conclusionThis study characterizes the urinary microbiota of BCa patients and, for the first time, provides a reliable non-invasive diagnostic method based on urinary microbiota. The introduction of the innovative concept of "Urinetypes" and the identification of high-risk subtypes associated with BCa offer the potential for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
trial registrationThis trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) with the registration number ChiCTR2300070969, registered on 27 April 2023, https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ChiCTR2300070969. The registration details are publicly accessible on ChiCTR for verification and reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.