ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Clinical and radiological characteristics of novel subtypes of end-stage knee osteoarthritis based on joint space loss patterns in standing extended view and fixed flexion view.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to classify end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA) based on the pattern of joint space loss in standing extended view (SEV) and fixed flexion view (FFV) and to investigate clinical and radiological differences.
methodsA total of 459 knees from 300 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4 KOA were retrospectively analyzed. The knees were divided into three groups based on the pattern of joint space loss in SEV and FFV: group 1 (all loss) with joint space loss in both SEV and FFV, group 2 (flexion loss) with joint space loss only in FFV, and group 3 (extension loss) with joint space loss only in SEV. The primary endpoints were clinical and radiological parameters, while the secondary endpoints included intraoperative measurements and the survival rate until total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
resultsA total of 459 knees from 300 patients were included. Among the participants, there were 77 men (25.7%) (average age of 72.21 ± 7.35 years), and 223 women (74.3%) (average age of 72.75 ± 6.56 years) (p = 0.546). Compared to group 2, group 1 showed a larger hip-knee-ankle angle (9.8 ± 7.0° and 6.3 ± 5.0°, p < 0.001), higher VAS (6.3 ± 2.4 and 4.6 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), shorter time to surgery (7.1 ± 7.7 months and 11.0 ± 8.7 months, p < 0.001), smaller full flexion angle (114.3 ± 13.4° and 121.2 ± 11.9°, p = 0.001), and a higher total knee arthroplasty rate (76% and 57.2%, p < 0.001). Group 3 showed a larger flexion contracture angle compared to group 2 (10.00 ± 9.6° and 5.3 ± 5.4°, p = 0.032). The posterior tibial slope (PTS) was largest in group 2 (11.3 ± 3.3°), followed by group 1 (8.1 ± 3.3°), and smallest in group 3 (5.4 ± 2.7°) (both p < 0.001, respectively). There were no statistical differences in the intra-operative measurements. TKA was performed on 259 knees (64.3%), and the survival rates at 1 year were 48.1% for group 2, 29.2% for group 3, and 26.7% for group 1 (log-rank test, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that radiological and clinical differences exist within end-stage KOA based on joint space loss patterns. Additionally, our findings suggest that a larger PTS may be associated with less symptom severity in advanced KOA, contrary to its currently recognized negative effects. These findings may be beneficial for developing patient-specific treatment plans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.