ArticleBMC nursing2025
Situation analysis of implementation of the SMART safe discharge protocol: a study from East Guilan, Iran.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient discharge planning is a crucial component of healthcare systems in many countries, including Iran. Despite its significance, discharge plans are often not fully implemented, and numerous challenges hinder their execution. This study aimed to explore the achievements, challenges, and solutions for implementing the SMART (Signs, Medications, Appointments, Results, Talk with me) safe discharge protocol from nurses' perspectives.
methodsThis descriptive qualitative study employed purposive sampling involving 16 nurses from hospitals in eastern Guilan, northern Iran, between April and September 2024. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were conducted until data saturation. Data analysis was performed using conventional content analysis, guided by Graneheim and Lundman's (2004) model, utilizing MAXQDA 2007 software. To ensure trustworthiness, Lincoln and Guba's (1985) criteria were applied.
resultsData analysis revealed 46 initial codes and four main categories: "Patient and family participation in the education process", "Comprehensive and systematic approach to education at the time of discharge", "Challenges in implementing the safe discharge protocol", and "Control and monitoring". Participants reported that the SMART protocol enhances patient education from hospitalization onset, involving active patient and family participation. Although the protocol offers a more holistic and systematic approach, barriers such as incomplete discharge forms, time constraints, and ward overcrowding hinder full implementation. The effective control and supervision of head nurses and clinical supervisors are critical to ensuring the successful implementation of the protocol.
conclusionsThe SMART protocol has enhanced discharge education by offering a more structured approach. However, several challenges hinder its full implementation and require attention from relevant authorities to ensure more effective execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.