Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696335›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2025

A systematic review of prescription errors in paediatric care.

G D Hannibal, Nvnn Vithanage, M T Madhushika, T K Sinhabahu, I Kankananarachchi, Plgc Liyanage

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Drug-related problems and their predictors in pediatric community-acquired infections: the role of pharmacist-led interventions in Pakistan.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Preventing Medication Errors in Paediatrics: A Narrative Review.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G D HannibalDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka. dillonhannibal22@gmail.com.
Nvnn VithanageDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.
M T MadhushikaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.
T K SinhabahuDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.
I KankananarachchiDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.
Plgc LiyanageDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription errors (PE) are more prone to occur in paediatric care due to weight-based dosing and age-specific formulations. The review aims to determine the prevalence of PE, factors associated and strategies employed to mitigate PE in paediatric care. METHODOLOGY: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases using predefined terms related to prescribing errors and pediatric populations. Studies involving individuals under 18 years of age and focusing on prescribing errors in various healthcare settings were included. Two independent reviewers screened citations based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, resolving disagreements through discussion. Data extraction covered study characteristics, prescribing error types, associated factors, and preventive strategies. The quality of included studies was assessed using Allan and Barker’s criteria used in examining PE.

resultsThe review included nine studies. Prevalence of PE varied from 22 to 70%. The most frequent PE type reported was dosing error (five out of nine articles) in both paediatric inpatient and emergency departments, whereas in outpatient settings it was inappropriate abbreviations. Antibiotics emerge as the most frequently implicated drug class. Only two articles have presented associated factors with PE. Parent factors such as poor health literacy (p < 0.001), language proficiency (p < 0.001), patient variables like age, weight, and other contextual factors including hospital stay, number of medications and medication administration methods were the main factors associated with PE (p < 0.05).The interventions that have shown statistically significant effectiveness in reducing PE were implementing e-learning resources, utilizing a color-coded method for dose determination, educating physicians and implementing templated prescriptions (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis review highlights the high prevalence of prescribing errors in pediatric care, with dosing errors being the most common, particularly in inpatient and emergency settings. Antibiotics were the most frequently implicated drug class. Highlighting the preventable nature of these errors, our analysis confirms the need for further studies on PE focusing on factors affecting prescription errors and targeted interventions to reduce these errors in paediatric care.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPediatricsChildHumansDrug prescriptionsDrug-Related side effects and adverse reactionsMedication errorsPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID40696335
PMCPMC12281725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.