SynthesisBMC surgery2025
Clinical outcomes of rib graft use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rib Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Autologous, Fresh-frozen, and Irradiated Cartilage.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRib cartilage rhinoplasty has emerged as a preferred surgical approach for complex nasal reconstructions due to its structural integrity, versatility, and long-term stability. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the complication rates and patient satisfaction outcomes associated with rib cartilage rhinoplasty to provide a comprehensive assessment of its safety and efficacy.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were original studies reporting complication rates or patient satisfaction following rib cartilage rhinoplasty with a minimum follow-up of six months. Data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Forest plots and funnel plots were generated to summarize findings and evaluate publication bias.
resultsA total of six studies were included, comprising 888 patients. The pooled complication rate was 7% (95% CI: 5–9%) under the fixed-effects model and 8% (95% CI: 3–20%) under the random-effects model, with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 79.3%, p = 0.0002). Complications were predominantly minor, including infection, warping, and graft displacement. Patient satisfaction rates were consistently high, with a pooled proportion of 92% (95% CI: 90–94%) under the fixed-effects model and 89% (95% CI: 60–98%) under the random-effects model. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I² = 86%, p < 0.0001). Funnel plots indicated potential publication bias, particularly in studies reporting patient satisfaction.
conclusionsRib cartilage rhinoplasty demonstrates a favorable safety profile and high patient satisfaction, making it a reliable option for complex nasal reconstructions. The low complication rates, combined with excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes, underscore the efficacy of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.