ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
A fifteen-year retrospective analysis of varicocele embolization: evaluating success, recurrence rates and embolic agents.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Varicocele: comparison of minimally invasive treatment options : Endovascular embolization, microsurgery, and patient-tailored treatment selection].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Live Birth Rates After Varicocele Embolization in Patients After Failed In Vitro Fertilization With Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.Andrology · 2026Article
- Why Varicoceles Recur: Missed Venous Anatomy and Contemporary Strategies for Salvage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA varicocele is a venous dilatation due to valvular incompetence within the pampiniform plexus, affecting 10-20% of the population and found in 40% of men with primary infertility (Hum Reprod Update 7(1):59-64, 2001, Cochrane Database System Rev (3), 2004, Curr Urol 6(1):33-6, 2012, World J Men's Health 37(1):4, 2019). Varicocele associated pain occurs in 2-10% of cases (Hum Reprod Update 7(1):59-64, 2001, SpringerPlus 4:1-5, 2015). Treatment options include conservative management, percutaneous embolization, or surgery (Urology 72(1):77-80, 2008). In the literature, percutaneous embolization has a technical failure rate ranging from 0 to 13.9% and recurrence rates of around 13% (Cochrane Database System Rev 4(4):CD000479, 2021). This study evaluates the success and recurrence of percutaneous varicocele embolizations over fifteen years and compares the embolic materials used.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of all adult patients who underwent varicocele embolization performed from April 2008 to February 2023 in two tertiary centres. Data collected included patient age, procedure date, access site, side of occurrence, previous interventions, treatment method, need for re-intervention, and recurrence rates. We defined technical success as successful access to the gonadal vein and embolization of same with coil/sclerosant. We assessed clinical success through follow-up telephone consultations and ultrasound.
resultsThe technical and clinical success rate was 96% and 93.75%, respectively. Of 225 patients, 3.12% had prior failed surgeries, all were treated successfully with IR, and only 0.89% required further surgical intervention. Patients reported recurrence rate of 25% of cases during telephone follow-up. However, the confirmed actual recurrence rate based on ultrasound was only 6.25%. The complication rate was low (1.78%), with no major events. Among patients treated for subfertility, 51.35% achieved successful conception following percutaneous embolization. Outcomes did not significantly differ based on the type of embolic material used.
conclusionPercutaneous embolization is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for varicocele, demonstrating high technical and clinical success regardless of embolic material used with a low recurrence rate over long-term follow-up. It remains effective even in cases of prior failed surgical repair and is associated with promising fertility outcomes. These findings support embolization as a first-line treatment in varicocele management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.