Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696171›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2025

EMT and cancer: what clinicians should know.

Erik W Thompson, Andrew D Redfern, Simone Brabletz, Geert Berx, Veenoo Agarwal, Karuna Ganesh, Ruby Y Huang, Dana Ishay-Ronen, Pierre Savagner, Guojun Sheng and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erik W Thompson *School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. e2.thompson@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9723-4924
Andrew D Redfern *UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-8713
Simone BrabletzDepartment of Experimental Medicine 1, Nikolaus-Fiebiger Center for Molecular Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-1526
Geert BerxMolecular and Cellular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5770-2458
Veenoo AgarwalUWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Karuna GaneshMolecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4948-1082
Ruby Y HuangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-3185
Dana Ishay-RonenOncology Institute, Shaba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-1408
Pierre SavagnerINSERM UMR 1186, Integrative Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Faculty of Medicine, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Guojun ShengInternational Research Center for Medical Sciences (IRCMS), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Marc P Stemmler *Department of Experimental Medicine 1, Nikolaus-Fiebiger Center for Molecular Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-3686
Thomas Brabletz *Department of Experimental Medicine 1, Nikolaus-Fiebiger Center for Molecular Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. thomas.brabletz@fau.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell plasticity is a crucial trait for cancer progression towards metastasis and treatment resistance. Research efforts from the past 20-30 years have revealed that the dynamic flux of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) programme is one of the major underlying processes enabling cancer cell plasticity and greatly facilitates these major causes of cancer mortality. The spectrum of evidence ranges from extensive data from cell line and animal model studies across multiple cancer types through a rapidly expanding body of work demonstrating associations between EMT biomarkers and disease progression and mortality in patients. EMT is also implicated in resistance to most of the major treatment modalities, yet our efforts to harness this knowledge to improve therapeutic outcomes are currently in their early stages. In this Review, we describe clinical evidence supporting a role of EMT and the associated epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in various stages of cancer in patients and discuss the subsequent clinical opportunities and challenges associated with attempts to implement this knowledge as novel therapies or clinical management approaches.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionNeoplasmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell PlasticityDisease ProgressionHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.