ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Paediatric cranial ultrasound: assessment of the preterm brain.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation analysis of blood metabolites and periventricular leukomalacia in preterm infants two weeks postnatally.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of snake model imaging selection and analysis to the ultrasound diagnosis of white matter damage in preterm infants.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranial ultrasound is an invaluable tool in assessing neonatal brain anatomy and pathology. It is accessible, relatively quick, inexpensive, safe, portable and generally well-tolerated. This pictorial review focuses on the use of cranial ultrasound in evaluating the premature brain. We illustrate the different grades of intraventricular haemorrhage, the most common sequela of prematurity, its evolution and potential complications, as well as periventricular leukomalacia. Anatomical variants and benign findings that mimic preterm brain injury are also discussed. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Cranial US is an invaluable tool for assessing neonatal brain anatomy and pathology and can be used in preterm infants to diagnose, monitor and assess for complications of intraventricular haemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia. KEY POINTS: Cranial US (CUS) is an invaluable tool for assessing the neonatal brain and has many advantages over MRI. CUS can detect intraventricular haemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, the most important sequelae of prematurity. Knowledge of optimal CUS technique, normal anatomy, and variants/benign sonographic findings that mimic pathology is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.