Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696054›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Paediatric cranial ultrasound: assessment of the preterm brain.

Caoilfhionn Ní Leidhin, Michael Paddock, Paul M Parizel, Richard R Warne, Peter Shipman, Rahul Lakshmanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caoilfhionn Ní LeidhinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. caoilfhionn.nileidhin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-9393
Michael PaddockSKG Radiology, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Paul M ParizelMedical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Richard R WarneDepartment of Medical Imaging, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Peter ShipmanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Rahul LakshmananDepartment of Medical Imaging, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. rahul.lakshmanan@health.wa.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial ultrasound is an invaluable tool in assessing neonatal brain anatomy and pathology. It is accessible, relatively quick, inexpensive, safe, portable and generally well-tolerated. This pictorial review focuses on the use of cranial ultrasound in evaluating the premature brain. We illustrate the different grades of intraventricular haemorrhage, the most common sequela of prematurity, its evolution and potential complications, as well as periventricular leukomalacia. Anatomical variants and benign findings that mimic preterm brain injury are also discussed. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Cranial US is an invaluable tool for assessing neonatal brain anatomy and pathology and can be used in preterm infants to diagnose, monitor and assess for complications of intraventricular haemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia. KEY POINTS: Cranial US (CUS) is an invaluable tool for assessing the neonatal brain and has many advantages over MRI. CUS can detect intraventricular haemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, the most important sequelae of prematurity. Knowledge of optimal CUS technique, normal anatomy, and variants/benign sonographic findings that mimic pathology is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary concern.

Indexed as

BrainHeadInfantPathologyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40696054
PMCPMC12283540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.