ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative global longitudinal strain predicts myocardial hypertrophy burden but not the magnitude of reverse remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- A composite index for predicting improvement of mitral regurgitation in patients with multivalvular heart disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the treatment of choice for young patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (RR) after surgery is expected to occur, even though its definition is largely heterogenous and ill-defined. However, LV RR not always occurs following afterload relief, and such may impact the prognosis. Single-centre prospective study including patients referred for SAVR due to severe symptomatic AS, with no previous history of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Both pre- and post-operative transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study (at the 3rd to 6th month after SAVR) were performed. LV RR was defined when in presence of at least one of the imaging criteria: >15% decrease in end-diastolic volume (CMR); >15% decrease in LV indexed mass (CMR); >10% decrease in geometric remodeling (LV mass/EDV ratio) by CMR; >10% increase in LV ejection fraction (CMR); >50% increase on global longitudinal strain (TTE). We assess the prognostic value of RR definitions for the outcome after SAVR using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization or worsening HF. We enrolled 140 patients - mean age 71 ± 9 years-old, 49% male, predominantly high-gradient-normal flow AS submitted to SAVR. At a mean follow-up of 34 ± 12 months, 16% patients met the primary endpoint, with an overall mortality rate of 6%. Twelve patients (9%) were admitted for HF and 7 (5%) had at least one episode of worsening HF. 118 patients had complete pre and post-surgery imaging study (mean follow-up: 36 ± 10 months): 103 patients (87%) met at least one RR parameter. Post-operative RR was not independently associated with the primary endpoint. LV mass regression was the sole predictor of the outcome. LV RR after SAVR is highly prevalent in a cohort of patients with classical severe symptomatic AS. However, only LV mass regression independently predicts the clinical outcome after surgery. LV structural remodeling, rather than functional improvement after surgery, may better define the prognosis after pressure overload relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.