Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Side bias behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris) is influenced by task complexity.

Anna Kis, Hannah Roper, Henrietta Bolló, Antónia Balogh, Anna Gergely, József Topál

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna KisPsychobiology Research Group, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary. vargane.kis.anna@ttk.hu.
Hannah RoperPsychobiology Research Group, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary.
Henrietta BollóPsychobiology Research Group, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary.
Antónia BaloghPsychobiology Research Group, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna GergelyPsychobiology Research Group, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary.
József TopálPsychobiology Research Group, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Side bias is often reported in canine cognition experiments when dogs' behaviour is tested in two-way choice tasks. Recently it has been proposed that side bias, which remains consistent over time and across different situations, may parallel a human psychiatric condition known as visual neglect. Here we tested an additional factor that could contribute to the development of side bias behaviour in dogs: task complexity. Subjects were tested in a series of two-way choice tasks of varying difficulty and the proportion of subjects showing side bias was compared across these tasks. Results showed that dogs were more likely to develop side bias in more complex situations, such as the food preference task, or in more unusual tasks, such as elbow pointing, compared to simpler tasks like sustained pointing. This suggests that, as expected, task complexity contributes to dogs' side bias, with side preference potentially being at least partly triggered by more challenging tasks that yield decreased reward.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorAnimalsCognitionDogsFemaleMaleRewardAnimal modelChoice taskSide biasTask complexity

Identifiers

PMID40696039
PMCPMC12284056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.