ArticleScientific reports2025
Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio is associated with all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in chronic kidney disease based on NHANES 2001-2018.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of sex on the association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and mortality in perioperative patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective analysis of the INSPIRE database.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-Albumin Ratio and Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio in IgA Nephropathy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) and both all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data from 7854 CKD patients aged ≥ 20 years were analyzed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2001 to 2018. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models, subgroup analyses, smoothed curve fitting, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were employed to examine the association between NPAR and mortality risk. Additionally, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare NPAR's predictive performance against traditional inflammatory markers. During a median follow-up of 79 months, there were 2795 all-cause deaths and 1019 CVD deaths. A U-shaped association was identified between NPAR and all-cause mortality, with an inflection point at NPAR = 12. Below this threshold, higher NPAR was associated with lower mortality risk (HR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.99); above it, increased NPAR corresponded to higher risk (HR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.12-1.16). Additionally, NPAR exhibited a positive association with CVD mortality (HR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12). Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest NPAR quartile demonstrated significantly increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 2.24, 95% CI 1.88-2.66) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.91, 95% CI 1.42-2.58). ROC curve analysis demonstrated NPAR's superior predictive capability compared to traditional inflammatory markers. NPAR exhibits significant associations with mortality outcomes in patients with CKD and surpasses traditional inflammatory markers in predicting mortality risk, highlighting its potential clinical value as a simple and cost-effective prognostic indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.