ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning algorithm for the automatic assessment of axial vertebral rotation in patients with scoliosis using the Nash-Moe method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- VerteRo: A Fully Automated Deep Neural Network Tool for Estimating Axial Vertebral Body Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessments of axial vertebral rotation (AVR) is essential for managing idiopathic scoliosis. The Nash-Moe classification method has been extensively used for AVR assessment; however, its subjective nature can lead to measurement variability. Therefore, herein, we propose an automated deep learning (DL) model for AVR assessment based on posteroanterior spinal radiographs. We develop a two-stage DL framework using the MMRotate toolbox and analyze 1080 posteroanterior spinal radiographs of patients aged 4-18 years. The framework comprises a vertebra detection model (864 training and 216 validation images) and a pedicle detection model (14,608 training and 3652 validation images). We improved the Nash-Moe classification method by implementing a 12-segment division system and width ratio metric for precise pedicle assessment. The vertebra and pedicle detection models achieved mean average precision values of 0.909 and 0.905, respectively. The overall classification accuracy was 0.74, with grade-specific performance between 0.70 and 1.00 for precision and 0.33 and 0.93 for recall across Grades 0-3. The proposed DL framework processed complete posteroanterior radiographs in < 5 s per case compared with conventional manual measurements (114 s per radiograph). The best performance was observed in mild to moderate rotation cases, with performance in severe rotation cases limited by insufficient data. The implementation of DL framework for the automated Nash-Moe classification method exhibited satisfactory accuracy and exceptional efficiency. However, this study is limited by low recall (0.33) for Grade 3 and the inability to classify Grade 4 towing to dataset constraints. Further validation using augmented datasets that include severe rotation cases is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.