ArticlePediatric research2025
Prognostic biomarkers of biliary atresia-are we there yet?
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic landmark models predicting native liver survival after kasai portoenterostomy: a bicentric study.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Biliary Atresia: A Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- SULT2B1 promotes cholangiocyte epithelial-mesenchymal transition in biliary atresia: one baby step or a giant leap in the pathogenesis of biliary atresia?Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biliary atresia (BA) is a progressive cholangiopathy and the leading cause of pediatric liver transplantation. While its etiology remains unclear, factors such as developmental anomalies, viral infections, and immune dysregulation have been implicated. Early Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the standard surgical intervention to restore bile flow, with serum bilirubin normalization serving as a key success indicator. Even after successful KPE, progressive fibrosis remains a major challenge. Recent research has focused on identifying biomarkers for BA prognosis, ranging from indicators of cholangitis and portal hypertension to predictors of jaundice clearance and native liver survival. The study by Taylor et al. explores early immune signatures predicting post-KPE biliary drainage in BA. Their findings revealed that increased monocyte-like macrophages (MLM) and elevated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) levels correlated with improved bile flow post-KPE. The authors suggest that GM-CSF-driven macrophage polarization may enhance an anti-inflammatory response, potentially influencing fibrosis progression and long-term liver function. While these findings provide valuable insight into immune-mediated mechanisms in BA, we show there remains ambiguity around the clinical utility of biomarkers in BA. Studies are still needed to validate these prognostic biomarkers and improve risk stratification in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.