ArticleScientific reports2025
Anomaly detection in encrypted network traffic using self-supervised learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Privacy and security in network communication have been enhanced via encryption and traditional anomaly detection methods are no longer effective because of their payload inspection. In this paper, we describe ET-SSL, a new approach for encrypted data anomaly detection which uses self-supervised contrastive learning to identify informative representations in flow level, statistical features like packet length; inter arrival time; flow duration and protocol metadata to Detect anomalies in encrypted network traffic without the need for labelled datasets or payload analysis. ET-SSL extends the use of SSL based traffic classification in order to improve detection performance while keeping computational complexity low through the maximization of the difference between normal and anomalous traffic. On CIC-Darknet2020, ISCX VPN (nonVPN), and UNSW-NB15 datasets, ET-SSL achieves 96.8 percent accuracy, 92.7 percent true positive rate (TPR), 1.2 percent false positive rate (FPR), and can do real time anomaly detection with 15 ms to 25 ms latency and speeds up to 10 Gbps processing which makes it suitable for high speed and resource constrained environments. Compared with existing methods, ET-SSL does not rely on labeled data, scales better, and detects zero day attack in dynamic network environment more effectively, serving as a paradigm for private and energy efficient anomaly detection in encrypted traffic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.