ArticleScientific reports2025
Influence of body position and time of day on ocular rhythms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adrenergic Pathways Mediate Circadian IOP Rhythm in Rats.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of retinochoroidal changes after implantable collamer lens implantation: insights from UWF-SS-OCTA and AI-based 3D modeling.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Underestimation of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) After LASIK and PRK: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Circadian IOP Rhythm in Rats Is Driven by Neural Signals From the Brain.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Posture-Induced Intraocular Pressure Changes at Different Times of Day in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Associated Factors and Exploratory Analyses of Antiglaucoma Medication Regimens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine the influence of time of day and body position on axial length, microvasculature, and intraocular pressure (IOP), participants (N = 23, ages 22-46 years) were enrolled in four 4-hour experimental sessions, which varied by time of day (morning or night) and body position (upright or supine). Blood pressure, heart rate, IOP, biometry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging were performed every 2 h. For supine sessions, IOP was also measured 10 min after position changed to upright. When upright for 4 h in the morning, axial length increased 10.0 ± 2.8 μm (P = 0.005). When supine in the morning, axial length decreased 8.7 ± 2.2 μm (P < 0.001). When upright at night, axial length decreased 18.3 ± 2.3 μm (P < 0.001), and choroidal thickness increased 7.7 ± 1.4 μm (P < 0.001). When supine at night, axial length decreased 37.0 ± 3.4 μm (P < 0.001) and choroidal thickness increased 14.1 ± 1.7 μm (P < 0.001). IOP measured 10 min after transitioning to an upright position showed an acute decrease (P < 0.05). No significant changes in retinal microvasculature were observed with body position or time (P > 0.05 for all). In conclusion, body position and time of day influence axial length, choroidal thickness, and IOP, indicating that extrinsic factors work in conjunction with diurnal factors to mediate ocular rhythms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.