Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40695894›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

How and when servant leadership affect public employees' innovative behavior.

Fen-Xian Xiao, Yun Lin, Jun-Feng Kuang, Lin-Lin Yang, Qiu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fen-Xian XiaoCollege of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok City, Thailand.
Yun LinSchool of Finance and Public Administration, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Jun-Feng KuangSchool of Law and Political Science, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Lin-Lin YangSouthwest Borderland Minority Research Center, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Qiu WangCollege of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok City, Thailand. hnnywangqiu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on job demands-resources theory, this study explains the underlying mechanism by which servant leadership affects public employees' innovative behaviors. Building upon this foundation, the study constructs a hypothesized theoretical model positioning psychological safety as the mediator and public service motivation as the moderator. Through institutional cooperation with graduate schools at two universities in Yunnan Province, China, a survey was administered to 680 Master of Public Administration students, yielding 642 valid responses for analysis. Based on a sample of 642 public employees from public organizations in China, servant leadership was found to positively affect public employees' psychological safety and innovative behaviors. Psychological safety partially mediated the relationship between servant leadership and innovative behaviors. Furthermore, public service motivation moderated the link between psychological safety and innovative behaviors. These findings suggest that public organizations must develop and train servant leaders using various strategies to establish and maintain a psychologically safe work environment conducive to innovation and also should attach importance to the significant role of public service motivation in enhancing innovative behaviors among public employees.

Indexed as

CreativityLeadershipAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPublic SectorSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceInnovative behaviorPsychological safetyPublic service motivationServant leadership

Identifiers

PMID40695894
PMCPMC12284262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.