ArticleScientific reports2025
Conformal prediction quantifies wearable cuffless blood pressure with certainty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conformal uncertainty quantification to evaluate predictive fairness of foundation AI model for skin lesion classes across patient demographics.Health information science and systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Though wearable cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement technology has attracted significant attention from both academia and industry, the ability of existing methods and devices to track dynamic BP changes and provide reliable BP readings remains low, especially in ambulatory environments. This study develops and validates an algorithm for 24-h ambulatory cuffless BP confidence intervals (CIs) estimation with conformal guaranteed coverage of the true BP values using wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) on subjects in the ambulatory setting. First, a quantile loss-based Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT) model was trained to obtain ambulatory BP estimates along with model uncertainty. The model uncertainty was then calibrated using conformal prediction to obtain CIs with guaranteed reference values coverage. Ambulatory physiological data from 483 participants from the Aurora-BP study dataset were used for model validation. For ambulatory measurements during the daytime phase, the mean absolute difference (MAD) of the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimated by the proposed model was 14.32 mmHg and 9.53 mmHg, respectively. For ambulatory measurements during the nighttime phase, the MAD of SBP and DBP estimated by the proposed model were 14.22 mmHg and 10.13 mmHg, respectively. Providing CIs with guaranteed reference BP coverage for 24-h ambulatory BP estimation can enhance the trust of patients and physicians in wearable devices, thereby facilitating the prevention, screening, and management of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.