Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40695892›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Design of a dynamic trust management and defense decision system for shared vehicle data based on blockchain and deep reinforcement learning.

Jinxiang Chen, Yan Li, Jiaxing Deng, Beicheng Qin, Chengcai He, Qiangsheng Huang, Jingchun Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinxiang ChenShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yan LiShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Jiaxing DengShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Beicheng QinShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China. qbc1717@163.com.
Chengcai HeShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Qiangsheng HuangShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Jingchun WuShenzhen Ruipengfei Mold Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust management in shared vehicle data systems presents significant challenges, necessitating innovative approaches. A data analysis system integrating blockchain-based distributed trust management with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is introduced to address these issues. The proposed system includes two core components: (1) User Trust Evaluation Model: Bayesian statistical methods are employed to estimate user credibility, utilizing historical interaction records as prior information. Blockchain technology separates the data chain and trust chain, enabling a distributed architecture that enhances data storage security and trust management robustness. (2) Behavioral Modeling and Defensive Strategies: The shared vehicle service process and user behavior are conceptualized as a Markov Decision Process. Using the Deep Q-Network (DQN) algorithm, the system identifies optimal defensive strategies through multidimensional data interactions. Performance evaluation is conducted using the Autonomous Driving Dataset ( https://github.com/DRL-CASIA/Autonomous-Driving-Dataset-Open ), with the following key metrics: (1) Trust Evaluation Accuracy: Assesses the precision of the system in evaluating user trust. The blockchain-based approach enhances accuracy by approximately 16% compared to centralized methods, demonstrating its reliability. (2) Average System Reward: Indicates the expected return from implementing defensive strategies. The DQN-based system achieves a performance increase exceeding 20% compared to Q-learning, highlighting its decision-making efficacy. (3) Malicious Behavior Detection Rate: Measures the system's ability to detect and address malicious activities. The proposed model attains a detection rate of approximately 93%, an improvement of over 15%, reflecting its advanced defensive capabilities. (4) Service Response Time: Evaluates the system's efficiency in responding to user requests. A reduction of more than 11% in response time underscores the enhanced operational speed. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed system in addressing trust management and decision-making challenges. By combining blockchain's decentralized storage capabilities with DRL's dynamic optimization potential, the system demonstrates a scalable and efficient approach for distributed data analysis in complex scenarios.

Indexed as

BlockchainDeep reinforcement learningDefensive decision-makingDistributed data analysisTrust management

Identifiers

PMID40695892
PMCPMC12284063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.