ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysing the impact of work environment on job motivation and quality control practices and its effect on production output in the leather industry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Productivity in the leather industry is influenced by multiple organizational factors, particularly the work environment, employee motivation, and quality control mechanisms. Understanding the interplay among these variables is critical for improving operational efficiency. This study investigates the impact of the work environment on production output in the leather industry, examines job motivation as a mediating variable, and explores the moderating role of quality control practices (QCP) in this relationship. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among employees in selected leather manufacturing units. The data were analyzed using PROCESS macro Model 58 in SPSS to test the mediation and moderation effects. Findings reveal that a supportive work environment significantly enhances job motivation, which in turn has a positive influence on production output. While the direct effect of the work environment on production is weak, the indirect pathway through motivation indicates a partial mediation. Furthermore, strong QCP reinforces the link between motivation and performance, strengthening the overall effect on productivity. The study highlights that leadership and organizational strategies focusing on improving workplace conditions and integrating robust quality control practices can foster higher motivation and productivity. The evidence emphasizes that a structured and supportive work environment indirectly enhances supply chain efficiency and production outcomes through motivated employee participation in quality processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.