ArticleNature communications2025
Relating natural image statistics to patterns of response covariability in macaque primary visual cortex.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Top-down perceptual inference shaping the activity of early visual cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Distinct System-Level Computations Underlie Perceptual Variation Across the Visual Field.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining how the brain encodes sensory information requires understanding the structure of cortical activity, including how its variability is shared among neurons. The role of this covariability in cortical representations of natural visual inputs is unclear. Here, we adopt the neural sampling hypothesis and extend a well-established generative model of image statistics, to explain pairwise activity as representing joint probabilistic inferences about latent features of images. According to the theory, variability reflects uncertainty about those latent features. In natural images, some sources of uncertainty are shared between features and lead to covariability between neurons, whereas other independent sources contribute to private variability. Our analysis shows that spatial context in images reduces shared uncertainty for overlapping features, whereas it reduces independent uncertainty for non-overlapping features. As a result, the model predicts that increasing the size of an image reduces correlations for pairs with overlapping receptive fields and increases correlations for pairs with offset receptive fields. This prediction was confirmed by recordings from male macaque primary visual cortex (V1). Our study establishes a precise connection between V1 correlations and natural scene statistics, suggesting patterns of covariability are a feature of probabilistic representations of scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.