ArticleNature communications2025
Protein design of two-component tubular assemblies similar to cytoskeletons.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure and dynamics of a four-protofilament microtubule from Heimdallarchaeales α/β-tubulin.Science advances · 2026Article
- A histidine switch controls the pH-responsive self-assembly of a helical protein filament.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dynamic Assembly of Pentamer-Based Protein Nanotubes.ACS nano · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in protein design have ushered in an era of constructing intricate higher-order structures. Nonetheless, orchestrating the assembly of diverse protein units into cohesive artificial structures akin to biological assembly systems, especially in tubular forms, remains elusive. To this end, we develop a methodology inspired by nature, which utilises two distinct protein units to create unique tubular structures under carefully designed conditions. These structures demonstrate dynamic flexibility similar to that of actin filaments, with cryo electron microscopy revealing diverse morphologies, like microtubules. By mimicking actin filaments, helical conformations are incorporated into tubular assemblies, thereby enriching their structural diversity. Notably, these assemblies can be reversibly disassembled and reassembled in response to environmental stimuli, including changes in salt concentration and temperature, mirroring the dynamic behaviour of natural systems. This methodology combines rational protein design with biophysical insights, leading to the creation of biomimetic, adaptable, and reversible higher-order assemblies. This approach deepens our understanding of protein assembly design and complex biological structures. Concurrently, it broadens the horizons of synthetic biology and material science, holding significant implications for unravelling life's fundamental processes and enabling future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.