ArticleBMJ open2025
Analysis of factors associated with hepatitis B and C exposure and reporting patterns among healthcare workers in a tertiary care facility: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the prevalence of occupational exposure to hepatitis B and C, examine exposure reporting patterns and identify associated factors among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a military hospital in Ghana.
designAnalytical cross-sectional study.
settingA 500-bed tertiary military healthcare facility in Accra, Ghana.
participantsA total of 369 HCWs were selected using stratified random sampling and completed a structured questionnaire. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 369 respondents. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using STATA V.17. Proportions, ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated, with a significance level set at 0.05. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the prevalence of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens (hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)) and the rate of reporting these exposures.
resultsIn the 12 months prior to the study, 20.1% of HCWs reported exposure to HBV or HCV. Exposures were more common during weekdays (60.8%) and afternoon shifts (47.3%). Only 37.8% of exposure incidents were reported. Male HCWs were more likely to report exposures than females (OR 82.5, 95% CI 2.5 to 273). Diploma holders were less likely to report compared with degree holders (OR 0, 95% CI 0 to 0.3).
conclusionsThe study demonstrates that HCWs in the military health facility face a significant risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens, yet under-reporting remains high. Strengthened training, clear reporting systems and supportive workplace policies are urgently needed to address these gaps and safeguard both staff and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.