ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
The influence of delayed ventricular activation on cardiac repolarization: Insights from electrocardiographic imaging.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In healthy human hearts, the T-wave is concordant with the QRS-complex, which is often explained by the negative relationship between the activation (AT) and repolarization time (RT). Delayed ventricular conduction is typically accompanied by discordant T-waves, but the link to regional repolarization is unknown. The present study aimed to compare AT-RT relationships in patients with narrow QRS-complexes (nQRS) vs. patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction disturbances (IVCD) using electrocardiographic imaging to reconstruct epicardial unipolar electrograms. Evaluations included the slopes of AT-RT relationships, maximum (max) AT and RT, ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEU; the difference of mean AT or RT between the left and right ventricle), and the standard deviation of AT (SDAT) and RT (SDRT). In nQRS patients, the AT-RT slope was highly variable (-0.370 ± 1.125, P = 0.193 ± 0.212), whereas it was consistently positive in IVCD and LBBB patients (1.220 ± 0.907 and 0.968 ± 0.325, P = 0.0172 ± 0.0254 and P = 0.0219 ± 0.0657 respectively). Max AT, max RT, AT-VEU, RT-VEU, SDAT and SDRT were similar for IVCD and LBBB patients and significantly higher compared to nQRS patients. In patients with delayed ventricular activation, there was a positive association between AT-VEU and RT-VEU (r = 0.549, P = 0.0149). The present study demonstrates that, in nQRS rhythms with concordant T-waves, the physiological assumption that sites of late activation have shorter repolarization intervals might not be consistently present at the epicardium. Furthermore, delayed ventricular activation is associated with delayed completion of repolarization and a dyssynchronous activation is accompanied by a dyssynchronous repolarization. KEY POINTS: This study examines the relationships between activation and repolarization times in epicardial reconstructed unipolar electrograms derived from ECG-imaging in patients with normal and delayed ventricular activation. In patients with a narrow QRS-complex and concordant T-waves on a 12-lead ECG, ECG-imaging reveals significant variability in the activation-repolarization time relationship. The physiological assumption that late-activated regions have a shorter repolarization interval may thus not always be valid on the epicardium. Patients with delayed ventricular activation typically exhibit discordant T-wave polarity on a 12-lead ECG and consistently demonstrate a positive activation-repolarization time relationship on ECG-imaging: regions of early activation correspond to shorter repolarization intervals, whereas regions of late activation correspond to longer repolarization intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.